When I wrote that article, South Africa was paramount in
my mind. I had become increasingly
bothered by the fact that leaders of countries were paying lip service to the
concept of freedom as they promoted that idea around the world while actively
helping the South African government to sustain its apartheid policy. I was also angered by the fact that some preachers
of my faith were boldly saying on Christian television that South Africa's apartheid regime was God's will and
that black South Africans were the cause of their own oppression. In retrospect, I feel that in my
disappointment and intense desire for change in South Africa, I did not look
beyond the plight of black people in South Africa to consider the potential that so many in
our world would still be subjected to so many forms of social injustice long
after Blacks in South Africa became free. However, I recall that I looked sufficiently far
back in history and knew enough about oppressed groups to be able to say in
that article that it would only be a question of time before the black people
of South Africa became free because oppression in that form was hardly
sustainable in an increasingly connected world.
Well, South African Blacks did become free but injustice continues
to survive in increasingly diverse forms around the world. Also, its
varied complexion and multiplicity of forms now make it more difficult to hope
for a world devoid of injustice. That
would be a world in which we all recognize that we are not truly free when some
of our brothers and sisters are in chains; a world in which some among us do
not have to prove themselves to be accepted just because of their pigmentation;
a world in which people who possess the same credentials and perform comparable
tasks are remunerated equally despite their gender; a world in which people are
not judged and condemned because of who they love; a world in which people's freedom of movement
is not curtailed just because of what they look like; a world in which people are
not profiled for punishment just because they do not come from the dominant
socioeconomic class or culture; a world in which we accept our responsibility to care
for the sick among us rather than subject that responsibility to heartless
political debates; a world in which all are truly equal in the application of law
just as we all are in the eyes of God. Simply, that is the world that we need but it is not
the world that we have – and the chances that we will ever have such a world
are increasingly diminishing by the day.
We should never claim to live in a just society (or world) if any among us
remains a victim of social injustice.
Indeed, the journey to socially just world is a tortuous one. This country was known to champion much of that but it seems we have slowly been backsliding after hundreds of years of progress. From hatred towards a president because of the mentioned skin pigmentation to the desire of the people's law makers to ignore the plight and pleas of those mostly vulnerable to an unfriendly heath care laws, it's clear that we indeed need a change of heart no matter what religious, economic, social or political class you are currently associated with.
ReplyDelete